Home Blog Page 61

So are electric vehicles safe in winter weather or what?

Source: Markus Volk / iStock via Getty Images

By David Callaway, Callaway Climate Insights

(Bill Sternberg is a veteran Washington journalist and former editorial page editor of USA Today.)

WASHINGTON, D.C. (Callaway Climate Insights) — When a heavy snowstorm smothered the DMV (as the District of Columbia, Maryland and Virginia are sometimes called) earlier this month, some people were without electricity for more than a week. And hundreds of motorists, including U.S. Sen. Tim Kaine, were stranded for more than 24 hours in sub-freezing weather on a nearly 50-mile stretch of I-95 between Washington and Richmond.

The epic traffic jam set off a round of finger-pointing at Virginia transportation officials. It also triggered a raging debate over whether the I-95 debacle would have been even worse if more people had been driving electric vehicles and, more broadly, whether today’s electric vehicles can cope with harsh winter conditions.

So, what’s the deal with EVs and winter weather? . . .

To read this column, all our insights, news and in-depth interviews, please subscribe and support our great climate finance journalism.

Callaway Climate Insights Newsletter

States With the Highest Gas Taxes

Source: lutherhill / E+ via Getty Images

Americans are gradually returning to the nation’s roadways, after the pandemic had suppressed travel. Gas prices have followed suit. Drivers now pay an average of $3.31 per gallon, according to AAA, from the sharp drop during the early days of the coronavirus, when gallon prices tumbled to as low as $1.74. (You might want to consider buying one of the most fuel-efficient brand new cars on the market.)

What Americans pay at the pump depends on the price of crude oil, determined by global supply and demand forces; the cost of transporting the fuel and refining costs; and taxes. Taxes are one of the variables responsible for the fact that the price of gas varies from region to region in the United States. To determine the states with the highest and lowest gas taxes, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed data on average state gas taxes in January 2022 from the American Petroleum Institute

 Already built into the price of a gallon of gas is the federal government tax of 18.4 cents. Each state also adds an excise tax. State-levied taxes and fees can account for anywhere from roughly 5% to more than 20% of the total cost of gas. (Note that taxes on diesel fuel are higher than those on gasoline in most states.) Federal and state governments have directed gasoline taxes to fund road construction and repair. 

Click here to see the states with the highest gas prices

The price of gasoline has been a sore spot for inflation-strapped consumers. From December 2020 to December 2021, the energy index portion of the Consumer Price Index leaped 29.3%, boosting the overall index by 7%, the  largest 12-month increase since the period ending June 1982. (No matter how pricey, gas is still a bargain in the U.S. compared to most other places. These are the countries with the most expensive gas last summer.) 

For motorists in California, who pay some of the highest gas prices in the nation, some relief might be on the way. California taxes gasoline at 68.2 cents per gallon, and that levy is scheduled to increase on July 1 because of inflation. However, Gov. Gavin Newsom wants to stop that hike, at least for this year, because the state is running a projected budget surplus of $45.7 billion, lifted by a massive increase in tax collections.

To determine the highest and lowest gas taxes in every state, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed data on average state gas taxes in January 2022 from the American Petroleum Institute. Data on state gas tax totals does not include the federal gas tax of 18.4 cents per gallon. Supplemental data on average prices for regular gas by state came from the AAA. Prices are current as of Jan. 14, 2021. Annual vehicle miles traveled per driver was calculated using data on total vehicle miles traveled in 2020 from the Federal Highway Administration and an estimate of the number of licensed drivers in 2020 based on FHWA data for the number of licensed drivers in 2019 and 2020 population data from the U.S. Census Bureau.

Jane Fraser’s climate opportunity; plus, the weak motives of ESG investors

Source: Chris LaBasco / iStock via Getty Images

By David Callaway, Callaway Climate Insights

Only 10 months into her new job as CEO of the world’s largest bank, Citi’s Jane Fraser is feeling the wrath of Wall Street for what it perceives as lack of progress in turning the bank around and its industry-trailing stock price. It’s a familiar story among Citi’s past few chief executives.

But beneath the headlines, Fraser has carved herself an opportunity in how the financial giant — and Wall Street — handles its role in guiding the clean energy transition. Fraser began a climate initiative on Day One last March, and this week updated shareholders with a new set of plans that actually will cut emissions in its energy and power portfolios, not just promise to cut. That’s new.

In these early days of 2022, where action is the buzzword on Wall Street when it comes to climate, Fraser has positioned Citi at the forefront of the battle for how Wall Street deals with the emissions from its portfolios and those of its biggest clients. While Fraser said she would only jettison polluting clients as a last resort, that is a step further than BlackRock’s Larry Fink went earlier this week. Let’s be honest, nobody wants to get rid of paying clients. Fraser has at least put them on notice.

Fraser’s update drew praise from Mike Bloomberg, chairman of the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, and put her out in front this year as the face of Wall Street change in climate, if it can.

Now Citi investors, along with everything they are watching in the bank’s performance, will have measurable emissions targets in the next several years to track Fraser’s performance. Hitting those, in the long run, could be much more important than last quarter’s stock price.

More insights below. . . .

Zeus: As nuclear gains favor, it’s time to talk about geoengineering

. . . . Nuclear power has always been controversial, with disasters such as Chernobyl and Fukushima still fresh in many memories. But as Europe prepares to reluctantly accept nuclear fuel as a way to bridge the gap between fossil fuels and growing renewable energy forms such as solar and wind, and the U.S. heads that way, too, David Callaway asks whether other controversial ways to fight climate change, including geoengineering, should be discussed more seriously by governments and the scientific community. One of them is currently the hottest fad on Wall Street. . . .

Read the full Zeus column

EU notebook: Germany steps up warnings against Russian invasion as natural gas rises

. . . . Germany’s new leaders stepped up emergency meetings with Russia, and warnings about consequences for an invasion of Ukraine as the Nord Stream 2 pipeline became a central component of the West’s leveraging power should an invasion occur, writes Elizabeth Hearst from Dublin. What this means for natural gas prices and Ukraine’s position as a catalyst for green hydrogen will be front and center as Europe’s winter energy crisis grows worse. . . .

Read the full EU notebook

Hulbert: What do ESG investors really want?

. . . . A new academic study lays bare the true motive that environmental, social and governance (ESG) investors have for picking stocks, and it should give every ESG investor pause, writes Mark Hulbert. Rather than invest in companies whose business practices, i.e. polluting, need to be changed, ESG investors focus on companies that are already clean. While this might make them feel better, it does little to make a big impact on climate mitigation. A bit of self-reflection is in order. . . .

Read the full story

Thursday’s subscriber insights: Following the money in Biden’s bridge rebuild

. . . . President Biden’s infrastructure bill allows for up to $27 billion to be spent repairing the nation’s bridges, the largest infrastructure project since the interstate highway system under Eisenhower. Investors looking to follow that money will find a bonanza for construction companies, in some states more than others. Read more here. . . .

. . . . As the electric vehicle boom leads to a hunger for more charging stations, shopping malls, hotels and fast-food restaurants are all stepping up with electricity for customers who come in the door. Taco Bell is just one of the parade of marketing strategies, where you can get a charge with your chalupa. But is the juice enough to boost sales? Read more here. . . .

. . . . What would Einstein say? The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists issued its annual Doomsday Clock announcement this morning and set the clock’s hands at 100 seconds to midnight, the same as the past two years. Given Russia, China, and the surge in climate disasters last year, we’re lucky it wasn’t closer. Read more here. . . .

. . . . PR giant Edelman, other other image-polishers and some CEOs of the companies they represent have come under fire for putting a spin of misinformation on climate change. Some 450 scientists say they are tired of trying to overcome “the advertising and public relations efforts of fossil fuel companies that seek to obfuscate or downplay our data and the risks posed by the climate crisis.” Read more here.

. . . . Triple-pane windows — a 30-year-old invention — have been modernized and are grabbing market share as they demonstrate their prowess in saving energy and cutting power bills. Read more here.

Editor’s picks: How heat is hitting carbon, cryptocurrency and quinoa

How hot is your cryptocurrency?

A House Energy and Commerce subcommittee was set to hold hearings today on the energy and environment impacts of cryptocurrency. The hearing of the Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations is titled, “Cleaning Up Cryptocurrency: The Energy Impacts of Blockchains.” E&E News notes that environmental groups have pressured lawmakers and regulators to assess emissions from the electronic production of cryptocurrency. According to the report, “The hearing could signal a shift in Congress’ attitude on producing cryptocurrency away from viewing it as a mere novelty. It also comes a week after the Biden administration cracked down on coal ash from the power sector, a move that affected a former coal plant currently used to mine Bitcoin.” Check the hearing webcast here.

Drought-resistant quinoa holds hope for better food security

Quinoa. Some folks just pretend they know how to pronounce this grain that has blossomed as a popular new ingredient for healthy cooking and foodie recipes. (It’s keen-waa.) But this highly nutritious South American grain has been around for thousands of years, and now a team of four plant geneticists at the Brigham Young University are working to modify the quinoa genome to grow in a wider variety of climates. The drought-resistant grain could provide food for nations struggling with food insecurity and the impacts of climate change. According to a report from the ABC affiliate in Salt Lake City, the team has received a grant from the USDA to fund the project, and under the grant, the researchers have identified over a dozen nations, including Morocco, Mexico, Vietnam, Kenya, and Pakistan, as partners in the project.

Words to live by . . . .

“The universe is wider than our views of it.” — Henry David Thoreau.

Callaway Climate Insights Newsletter

This Is the Most Densely Populated City in the World

Source: naveen0301 / iStock via Getty Images

The COVID-19 pandemic reminds people that crowded cities have distinct disadvantages, beyond those that are obvious. The omicron variant has aggressively spread at an unimaginable rate, and people in close quarters have suffered the effects brutally.

Areas with very high population density often have other troubles as well, including pollution, lack of clean water, and the trouble of providing services to areas where people literally live on top of one another. The most densely populated city in the world is Dhaka, Bangladesh.

The U.S. does not have cities that rank among the most densely populated in the world, but it can help highlight the extremes. While New Jersey has almost 1,200 residents per square mile, Alaska has 1.2 people per square mile. (This is the largest state in America.)

Using data on population density, population, and land area in global urban areas from the June 2021 edition of the World Urban Areas report from Demographia, an urban development research group, 24/7 Wall St. identified the most densely populated city in the world. Only areas with 500,000 residents were considered. The yardstick was based on the average number of people per square mile living in a given urban area.

To make our decision, cities were not ranked on their official municipal boundaries, but rather, the built-up land areas that, as described in the report, “function as an integrated economic unit, linked together by commuting flows, social and economic interactions.” By this definition, the New York City area has a population density of 4,477 people per square mile. However, the borough of Manhattan alone has a population density of 70,826 people per square mile.

Several of the most densely populated cities in the world are located in Africa and South America. However, the majority of cities on this list are in Asia, including over two dozen in India. No U.S. cities made the list.

Perhaps not surprisingly, some of the most densely populated cities in the world are also some of the most populous cities, home to over 10 million people. (This is America’s largest city.)

The most densely populated city in the world, Dhaka, Bangladesh, is home to 16.8 million residents who live in 176 square miles. The area’s population density is 95,676 people per square mile.

Click here to see the 50 most densely populated cities in the world

Zeus: As nuclear gains favor, it’s time to talk about geoengineering

Source: KevinCass / iStock via Getty Images

By David Callaway, Callaway Climate Insights

(David Callaway is founder and Editor-in-Chief of Callaway Climate Insights. He is the former president of the World Editors Forum, Editor-in-Chief of USA Today and MarketWatch, and CEO of TheStreet Inc.)

SAN FRANCISCO (Callaway Climate Insights) — The controversy over whether to use nuclear power as a transition energy as we move to renewables from fossil fuels has grown in just a few years from a philosophical debate to impending legal reality.

The next step will almost certainly be the elevation of certain geoengineering ideas, once derided as science fiction, to legitimate climate-fighting tools. Indeed, we may already be there.

So, it’s worth it to open the Pandora’s Box of geoengineering once more. The idea that hacking the atmosphere or oceans in a dramatic way might stop the sun’s increasing heat and destructive melting of the polar caps. . . .

To read this column, all our insights, news and in-depth interviews, please subscribe and support our great climate finance journalism.

Callaway Climate Insights Newsletter

The Most Devastating Natural Disasters in America in 2021

Source: Jon Durr / Getty Images News via Getty Images

The overwhelming consensus among climate scientists is that global warming is radically changing weather patterns. Heat waves are more prolonged and intense, storms are stronger and more frequent, and floodwater is pouring into new areas that are unprepared for the mayhem it causes. According to the United Nations, the rate of extreme weather events and ensuing natural disasters has surged five-fold since 1970, inflicting $3.64 trillion in losses worldwide.

While most of the human toll from this havoc is falling on people in underdeveloped and developing nations, the United States – responsible for the largest share of historical carbon emissions and currently the second-largest emitter after China – has not been immune to the cost of global warming-related disasters.

To determine the most devastating natural disasters in America in 2021, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed the National Centers for Environmental Information’s list of Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters, a record of the natural disasters that caused at least $1 billion worth of damage in 2021. Damage estimations are adjusted to the consumer price index. Information on duration of the events and the fatalities they caused comes from the same source.

Last year, 20 of the costliest weather-related disasters in the U.S. inflicted a total of $145 billion in damage to public and private properties. The median cost of these incidents was $1.45 billion, while the three most expensive disasters — wildfires in the West, winter storms across the country’s northern reaches, and Hurricane Ida — caused a combined $110 billion worth of damage. (Internationally, these are the costliest natural disasters of all time.)

Click here to see the most devastating natural disasters in America in 2021

Six of these climate-related disasters involved tornadoes that levelled communities in several Southern and Midwestern states. Hail storms pounded numerous states including the Dakotas, New Mexico, and Texas. Flooding unrelated to tropical storms or hurricanes inundated homes and businesses in California and across the South. Two hurricanes and two tropical storms also inflicted severe flooding in numerous Gulf and Eastern states. While stormwater was a major nemesis in last year’s climate disasters, drought conditions in the West inflicted nearly $9 billion in damage. (Here’s a sobering look at before-and-after pictures of the worst hurricanes in American history.)

This Is America’s Fastest Dying Industry

Source: AakaashBali / iStock via Getty Images

Over the past century, some once huge American industries have almost disappeared. Some of these provide products and services Americans no longer use or use much. Others succumbed to foreign competition. Foreign competition, though, isn’t responsible for the fact that America’s fastest dying industry is the administration of insurance funds.

Some increasingly moribund industries, though, involve manufacturing. Cities like Pittsburgh, Cleveland, Toledo, and Detroit were built on these. Now, the cities, and the industries that built them, are nearly gone, as steel production and rubber products are mostly made outside the United States and the car industry has been overwhelmed by products from Germany, Japan, and South Korea. GM is no longer the largest car company in America. After 90 years in the top spot, it was replaced by Toyota last year. (These are the largest car companies in the world.)

Another reason some industries have died is that technology has replaced humans. This has started in retail, where check-out functions can be done by computers. There are even now robotic waiters and cooks in restaurants. Many warehouse functions can be done by machines, as well. Estimates show that artificial intelligence-based products may kill hundreds of thousands of jobs in the next decade.

The demand for people to fill jobs in America has exploded. There are millions of jobs that companies have been unable to fill. Some of this may be due to low pay, as well as the fact that people who have received government assistance may feel less impetus to work full-time.

Even though the employment picture is favorable, there are sectors of the economy that are declining and their longtime prospects look grim. To identify America’s fastest dying industry, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed employment change from 2011 through 2020 for U.S. industries. All data was retrieved from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages.

Many sectors we considered have been declining for years and show no sign of reversing course. Every sector on the list shed more than 50% of its workforce from 2011 to 2020.

Click here to see America’s fastest dying industries

Retail has had a tough time attracting workers because of low wages, especially since the onset of the pandemic, as workers recoil from physical interaction with customers. Brick-and-mortar retail also has been in a prolonged decline because of e-commerce. (These are the 25 lowest-paying jobs in America.)

Not all the jobs lost are in manufacturing and retail. Employment at pension funds has been declining since the 1980s because fewer companies maintain pension plans for employees. Businesses do not want to take on the risk of promising employees defined benefits when they retire. Insurance funds, though, are America’s fastest dying industry.

Virtual Davos just isn’t the same; plus finding the next ‘1,000 unicorns’

Source: MadKruben / Getty Images

By David Callaway, Callaway Climate Insights

Davos Man just wasn’t built for a virtual experience. As the World Economic Forum’s annual confab kicked off virtually this week for a second year because of Covid, I found myself watching Xi Jinping highlights on my computer while daydreaming of snowy train rides, hot fondue, and the piano bar at the Hotel Europe.

The lack of conviviality among attendees seemed to find its way into the speeches of the leaders. Xi’s canned speech Monday made little news in terms of climate change, certainly compared to his global call for action five years ago on top of the mountain. And Indian leader Narenda Modi, who with China kneecapped a United Nations deal to phase out coal in Glasgow at COP26 in November, claimed his country will reach net-zero emissions by 2070. Which is kind of like ExxonMobil’s (XOM) promise this morning to be net zero by 2050.

This being Davos week, it’s no surprise that Peter Goodman’s new book, “Davos Man,” is being promoted. Goodman, a well-known New York Times economics correspondent, blames a handful of billionaires for the world’s woes, according to early reviews, while making the usual arguments for a wealth tax. I’ve judged Goodman’s reporting in journalism contests. He is a brilliant writer. I met him only once — in Davos — when he was working with Ariana Huffington. His argument may gain traction in some populist circles ahead of the midterm elections in the U.S. but blaming everything on Davos these days seems so pre-Covid, especially when the billionaires aren’t there to ignore it.

More up to date this week is Larry Fink’s annual letter, in which the BlackRock founder doubles down on his call for CEOs to imbue their companies with social and environmental goals. Fink said the next “1,000 unicorns won’t be search engines or social media companies, they’ll be sustainable, scalable innovators.” (More on this in Insights below).

As already demonstrated in the first two weeks of the year with deals announced by Blackstone, Goldman Sachs and the Carlyle Group, 2022 is going to be about actual investments in the renewables and clean tech spaces, to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars. Not more empty pledges. Save those for the virtual speeches.

More insights below. . . .

Tuesday’s subscriber insights: Finding Larry Fink’s 1,000 unicorns

. . . . Larry Fink came out swinging for sustainability again in his annual CEO letter this week, as the BlackRock founder defended shareholder capitalism and predicted the next wave of big companies — some 1,000 unicorns — will be in the sustainable space. But can they make money too? Read more here. . . .

. . . . For the first time in Europe, electric vehicle sales have overtaken diesel engine sales in a given month, according to new research. More than one in five cars sold in the European Union in December were electric. But how much of that is based on subsidies for buyers? And can that translate to the U.S.? Read more here. . . .

. . . . A lot of buzz last week about Just Capital’s new rankings of the top 100 ESG stocks in AmericaThe non-profit founded by Paul Tudor Jones ranked Alphabet (GOOGL) at the top and demoted Facebook/Meta Platforms (FB), and particularly cited Target (TGT) and as up-and-comer. But is it just another list of large-cap tech stocks? Read more here. . . .

. . . . The heat wave in Brazil, Australia and other parts of the Southern Hemisphere this month has generated playful headlines about beavers moving north to the arctic, but behind that is a food security crisis caused by drought and excessive heat that threatens several national economies. And food supply chains. Read more here. . . .

Editor’s picks: Financing clean energy, stopping methane leaks and refurbishing Toyotas

Pipeline safety agency eyes methane leaks

The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) is preparing restrictions on methane emissions and is expected to confront pipeline companies on the hazardous methane leaks, according to a report in E&E News. The report notes that Congress has given the PHMSA new responsibility to limit greenhouse gas emissions. Surveying companies about methane emissions could begin this year. Tristan Brown, PHMSA’s deputy administrator, said earlier this year, “Congress was very clear that we must not just reduce these emissions, but we must do all we can to minimize these emissions.” E&E notes that late in late 2020, Congress ordered pipeline companies to update inspections and maintenance plans to to reduce methane emissions.

Coal production reaches new record in China

Coal production in China reached record levels last year, The Guardian reports. The spike was the result of the government pushing miners to increase fossil fuel output to weather a winter gas crisis. China, the world’s biggest coal producer and consumer, produced a new high of more than 4 billion tonnes, up 4.7% from 2020. According to the International Energy Agency, global consumption of coal power, which is the world’s single biggest source of climate emissions, would reach record levels in 2021, spurred by increased energy demand to aid global economies amid the Covid pandemic.

It’s not a certified Toyota, it’s refurbished

Toyota UK has a new plan in the works to “refurbish” cars, remanufacturing them to increase their lifespan — ideally making them more efficient and sustainable. Road/Show by CNET reports “the idea is to take a car after its first use cycle, such as a lease term, and return it to the factory. There, it will be remanufactured to ‘the best standard’ and ready for a second cycle with a driver. Toyota may perform this one more time before it turns its attention to recycling the car responsibly. This may include reusing parts from the vehicle that are still in good condition, rebuilding batteries and much more.” The report also said Toyota USA declined to comment on any plans for a refurbishing program in the U.S.

Data driven: Frightening lightening

. . . . Saturday’s massive underwater volcanic eruption near the Kingdom of Tonga could affect the environment for decades to come, damaging coral reefs and hurting fisheries and island coastlines, experts say. The volcano, named Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai began erupting a few weeks ago, but exploded into action on Jan. 15, prompting widespread tsunami warnings and significant damage. But even more amazing, the volcano’s huge ash columns began to produce record-breaking amounts of lightning. In a report for National GeographicRobin George Andrews writes this volcano was at one point producing 200,000 discharges in a single hour. By comparison, Andrews notes, the 2018 eruption of Indonesia’s Anak Krakatau had 340,000 discharges over a week or so.

Callaway Climate Insights Newsletter

How to play the solar net-metering battle as stocks sink, plus Europe’s ghost flights

Source: LeoPatrizi / E+ via Getty Images

By David Callaway, Callaway Climate Insights

The war on solar companies in the U.S. spread to a second state this week – Florida – while California’s governor and Elon Musk spoke out against plans to slash subsidies for homeowners with just two weeks to go until a landmark decision is made. Investors are preparing for the worst.

Solar stocks such as SunPower (SPWR), First Solar (FSLR) and the Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) have tanked by a third since Thanksgiving. They are essentially in a no-man’s land until the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) rules on a proposal by utilities such as PG&E Corp. (PCG) to reduce payments made to residential homeowners with solar for excess energy sold back to the grid. Now Florida is trying to do the same (See Insights below).

The rift is unique in that it pits advocates for clean energy against advocates for social justice, essentially splitting the two-year partnership between climate and racial justice enthusiasts. Cutting subsidies to homeowners may crush solar installations and hurt companies and their stocks. But utilities insist the current system favors the wealthy by raising rates for those without solar panels.

Gov. Gavin Newsom, Musk, and institutional investors are against the proposal, and we can expect the rhetoric to increase the closer we get to Jan. 27, which is the earliest the CPUC can rule. A delay is possible, if a watered-down plan is put forward, which seems to be what Newsom is advocating.

For investors, the downside on net-metering has likely been priced in over the past several weeks, so any delay or possible vote against the proposal would be a boost to the shares. And the utilities, having sent their message, would likely support a compromise to the net-metering proposal. None of that will shake the drama of the next two weeks, but for solar shareholders, at this point it’s better to hang in there than to bail in the middle of the hysteria.

More insights below. . . .

Zeus: Jean Rogers jumps back in the deals game at Blackstone

. . . . Jean Rogers, founder of the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board, always insisted the point of sustainability disclosure standards was action, not measurement in its own right. Now as the new global head of Blackstone’s (BX) ESG business, she can put her company’s money where her mouth is, to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars, writes David Callaway, who interviewed her as she set up shop in New York. If this week is anything to go by, with Blackstone pulling off its biggest renewables deal to date, a $3 billion investment, it’s going to be an action-packed year. . . .

Read the full Zeus column

EU notebook: Broader carbon border tax urged in Brussels

. . . . Europe’s plan to tax carbon intensive industries such as cement and electricity on cross-border trade is controversial enough on the world trade stage, but now an influential member of the EU Parliament negotiating the deal wants to move it up from 2026, and to broaden it to other industries, writes Stephen Rae from Dublin. It’s an even bet whether the carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) will get through this summer, even in its current form. But among the EU’s tools to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions, it is one of the few that would have immediate implications on emissions, as well as the carbon trading market. . . .

Read the full EU notebook

Thursday’s subscriber insights: Backlash to Biden offshore wind plans threatens East Coast projects

. . . . In the renewable energy race, offshore wind in the U.S. is hardly off the mark compared to the thousands of turbines in Europe. That was supposed to change under President Joe Biden, but just as the government seems prepared to announce a slew of projects off the East Coast, a combination of opposition from fisheries, animal rights activists, and even wealthy coastal landowners is taking the wind from his sails. With so much opposition, can offshore wind ever take off in the U.S.? Read more here. . . .

. . . . It’s of little surprise that political donations are behind the campaign by utilities in Florida to force net-metering changes such as the ones proposed against solar companies in California. The battle against climate solutions is always fought on the down low. But Florida’s plan, which is legislation, may face a harder road than the California proposals, which are decided by the public utilities commission itself. Read more here. . . .

. . . . Europe has been enraged this week by stories of airlines flying “ghost flights” of empty passengers across the continent to maintain landing slots at international airports. The continent that invented “flight-shaming” for frequent travelers doesn’t know what to do with thousands of empty flights a week burning fossil fuels, and one executive’s call to just “sell the seats” was met with derision from the industry. This one, as they say in the media, has legs. Read more here. . . .

. . . . Cows with gas are a major methane pollution problem, but also potentially a teachable moment for educators struggling to reach young kids who will be most affected. As debate rages about the best way to reduce the methane and also use it for positive purposes, what better way to, uh, entertain a youthful audience than a climate tour of the nearby farm. Read more here. . . .

Editor’s picks: U.S. emissions spike in 2021; and where did Tesla’s Cybertruck go?

Coal helps spike U.S. greenhouse gas emissions in 2021

Total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions rose 6.2% in 2021, and the pace was faster than the rebound in energy demand, the Rhodium Group said in a report this week. The jump was attributed to the increase in use of coal-fired power plants in the face of higher natural gas prices. A report for S&P Global Market Intelligence says the research group warns in its preliminary assessment that the U.S. is now slipping farther behind its pledge to cut greenhouse gas emissions by at least 50% below 2005 levels by 2030 and reach net-zero by midcentury. After having achieved a 22.2% emission reduction since 2005 in 2020, the trajectory had slipped to just 17.4% in 2021. The Rhodium Group also said coal-fired generation in 2021 rose for the first time since 2014, as much as 17%, to reach 23% of all power produced in the U.S.

Where did Tesla’s Cybertruck go?

Where has Tesla’s Cybertruck gone — or when? Mashable reports this morning that it noticed the EV maker has removed from the Cybertruck site all references to its previously stated 2022 release date. The report notes that in October, Tesla “wiped the Cybertruck site of all pricing and model information, but kept a crucial detail: a production start time in 2022. Now if you go to the same order page, you’ll notice that where it once said, ‘You will be able to complete your configuration as production nears in 2022’ it only states, ‘You will be able to complete your configuration as production nears.’” Auto site Edmunds reports the change has some reservation holders worried about further delays in the production schedule. The Cybertruck was announced in 2019. Tesla (TSLA) stock was down about 4% in early afternoon trade Thursday. No word yet from Tesla on the delay, according to published reports.

Words to live by . . . .

“We tend to have forgotten the fact that we are a part of nature. Some people say that we are dependent upon it, but it’s become dependent upon us as well.” — Naturalist Chris Packham speaking at COP26.

Callaway Climate Insights Newsletter

This Is America’s Most Dangerous Beach

Source: hollykl / Flickr

Beachfront property is among the most expensive in the country. Among the highest priced homes in America are in places like Nantucket; the Hamptons on Long Island; Palm Beach, Florida; and Malibu in California. (These are America’s richest beach towns.)

Owning homes in these places does involve a level of risk. Among them are storms that can create flooding and do substantial water damage or destroy homes completely; climate change has made this an even larger threat. (These are American beaches that may soon disappear.)

There are other dangers, too, however, and America’s most dangerous beach is Venice Beach, part of Los Angeles.

That’s according to the nature and outdoor resource site Outforia’s recently released report “Dangerous Coasts: The United States’ Most Dangerous Beaches,” which goes well beyond weather considerations. The study considered crime, air pollution, water pollution, “surf zone” fatalities (principally drowning), lightning fatalities, shark attacks, and temperatures. The site used this data to create a composite score for American beaches running from 1 to 10, with 10 as the worst possible score.

There is no geographic pattern to the most dangerous beaches. Many are in states with large populations, particularly California and Florida. Plus, both have long coastlines. Florida’s coastline ranks second in length in the country, behind Alaska, and California ranks fifth, behind Louisiana and Maine.

Most of the other most dangerous beaches are along the East Coast, in states that include Delaware, New Jersey, North Carolina, and Virginia.

Click here to see America’s most dangerous beaches

Explaining why Venice Beach was ranked the worst in the country, Outforia noted “One of LA’s most well-known beaches tops the list as the most dangerous beach in the USA. With historical ties to gang activity and a particularly large homeless population, there is a high rate of crimes in the local area, contributing largely to the high danger score.”

Popular Posts